Language: 中文 | English

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q - Comparison and Performance Benchmarks

Products Being Compared

Product 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Specifications | Product 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q Specifications

Main Comparison Summary

Comparing NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q: Power Consumption differs by 6.3%, Stream Processors lags by 90.8%, Clock Speed leads by 59.7%, Floating Point Performance lags by 89.5%, Video Memory lags by 75%

Due to frequently updated benchmark data from multiple sources, if the comparison table doesn't cover all metrics, please visit the CPU Ranking List or GPU Ranking List for precise queries.

Complete Specifications Comparison

Specification
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q
Manufacturer NVIDIA NVIDIA
Launch Price ($) 149 --
Series GTX 16 RTX 40
Architecture Turing Ada Lovelace
Release Year 2019 2023 ↑
Market Desktop Mobile
Base Clock (MHz) 1485 ↑ 930
Boost Clock (MHz) 1665 2250 ↑
Memory Size (GB) 4 16 ↑
Memory Type GDDR5 GDDR6
Memory Bus (bit) 128 256 ↑
Shading Units 896 9728 ↑
FP32 2.984 28.31 ↑
ROPs 32 112 ↑
Process Size (nm) 12 ↑ 5
TDP (W) 75 80 ↑
Blender 442.9 --
Geekbench 39915 --

TIPS: Generally speaking, when making purchasing decisions, prioritize products with higher specifications within your budget range. For a brief buying guide, please Click here to view the guide.

If you find product data or functional issues, please click here to provide feedback or leave a comment. This will help us improve.

Recent Comparisons

Leave a Comment